![]() ![]() In part, that’s probably because blank-check special purpose acquisition companies provided a different way for private companies to go public during the SPAC market boom in 20.īut Slack and its lawyers from Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher contend there’s another reason why direct listings have been few and far between: As the company and its amici told the 9th U.S. Sounds like a great option for successful private companies, right? But only a handful of companies have taken advantage of direct listings. In a direct listing, as opposed to a traditional IPO, those insiders can sell their shares without a lock-up period, allowing them, rather than IPO underwriters, to reap most of the benefits of the public offering. ![]() These “direct listings” were supposed to be a faster, less expensive alternative to traditional IPOs for private companies that didn’t necessarily need to raise capital but wanted to reward insiders and investors. The Securities and Exchange Commission cleared the way in 2018 for privately held companies to go public through the sale of shares held by corporate insiders and early investors. Supreme Court to review a first-of-its-kind appellate ruling that, according to the company and its friends in the business lobby, has thwarted access to capital markets for successful private companies. May 4 - Slack Technologies Inc will ask the U.S. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |